Same sex marriage and the proposed federal marriage amendment in the us

Neither this Constitution, nor the constitution of any State, shall be construed to require that marriage or the legal incidents thereof be conferred upon any union other than the union of a man and a woman. It is important for people to understand that the argument has shifted from talk about tolerance and a right to homosexual relations based on a right to privacy to explicit public approval.

Same sex marriage and the proposed federal marriage amendment in the us

Same sex marriage and the proposed federal marriage amendment in the us

Neither this Constitution, nor the constitution of any State, shall be construed to require that marriage or the legal incidents thereof be conferred upon any union other than the union of a man and a woman. It is important for people to understand that the argument has shifted from talk about tolerance and a right to homosexual relations based on a right to privacy to explicit public approval.

Dogs, no matter what their relationship, are not allowed to marry. How should society treat gays and lesbians in committed relationships? As dogs or as humans? If this happens, the culture war is over and everything associated with it is lost.

We can ill afford to let far right leaders succeed again in swaying an election by exploiting irrational fears. The institution, really more than any other, determines the well-being of our future, of our children, of our communities. The "Marriage Amendment" to the U.

Constitution was first introduced into the House of Representatives on MAY The amendment, in its initial wording, stated: Neither this Constitution nor the constitution of any State, nor state or federal law, shall be construed to require that marital status or the legal incidents thereof be conferred upon unmarried couples or groups.

Opinions of the nature of the amendment, as originally written, differ sharply: Supporters of the amendment say that it would simply: Maintain the status quo: Restrict courts from interpreting constitutional law in a way that would achieve marital equality.

That is, the courts might give special privileges -- those that have traditionally been reserved only for married people -- to couples in common-law relationships: Maintain the freedom of individual state legislatures to pass laws, if they wish, which grant create civil unions or give common-law couples these rights and benefits.Members of Congress have proposed a constitutional amendment preventing states from recognizing same-sex marriages.

Proponents of the Federal Marriage Amendment claim that an amendment is needed immediately to prevent same-sex marriages from being forced on the nation.

T HE MASSACHUSETTS SUPREME COURT has legalized same-sex marriage for the first time in this country.

Most suspect the U.S. Supreme Court will throw a blanket of federal constitutional protection. I - The Proposed Federal Amendment Banning Same-Sex Marriage Does Nothing to Protect Heterosexual Marriage (continued) C) It Does Not Close Pandora's Box Many critics of same-sex marriage argue that if it is legalized, incest, polygamy, and bestiality will ensue.

As a diverse coalition, LCCR does not take a position for or against same-sex marriage. The issue of same-sex marriage is an extremely difficult and sensitive one, and people of good will can and do have heartfelt differences of opinion on the matter. The US is harder to put in either group because its constitutional protection for same-sex marriage comes from its Constitution, but laws about marriage are made in the states.

"The second time around proved the charm, as Arizona voters approved a constitutional amendment that bans same-sex marriage. Proposition proposed a word amendment to the state Constitution to define marriage as .

Federal Marriage Amendment - Wikipedia